The agricultural industry stands at a critical juncture where traditional farming practices are being reimagined to meet the dual challenges of increasing food production while preserving environmental sustainability. Among the most transformative approaches emerging in modern agriculture is the adoption of no-till farming, minimum tillage, and zero tillage systems that fundamentally reshape how farmers manage their soil resources. These conservation tillage practices represent a paradigm shift from conventional soil management, offering compelling benefits of no till farming that extend far beyond simple cost savings to encompass comprehensive environmental stewardship and long-term agricultural resilience.
The relationship between soil and tillage has evolved dramatically over the past several decades, driven by mounting evidence that excessive soil disturbance creates more problems than it solves. Research consistently demonstrates that reduced till farming approaches not only maintain crop productivity but often enhance it while delivering substantial economic and environmental advantages. As global adoption of these practices has increased by 93 percent over the past decade, reaching over 507 million acres worldwide1, farmers are discovering that the pros of no till farming create compelling value propositions that benefit both their operations and the broader ecosystem.
Understanding the Spectrum of Conservation Tillage Practices
Defining Tillage Approaches
The modern agricultural landscape encompasses a spectrum of tillage practices, each characterized by varying degrees of soil disturbance and residue management. Conventional tillage represents the traditional approach involving complete soil inversion through plowing, typically disturbing 90 percent of the soil surface and leaving less than 15 percent crop residue cover2. In stark contrast, minimum tillage and zero tillage systems dramatically reduce soil disturbance while maximizing surface residue retention.
Minimum tillage encompasses practices that limit soil disturbance to shallow depths of 2-4 inches using discs or tines, maintaining 30 percent or more residue cover to qualify as conservation tillage3. These systems reduce the number of field passes while preserving soil structure and organic matter. Strip tillage represents a hybrid approach that tills narrow strips where crops will be planted while leaving the remainder of the field undisturbed, combining benefits of both tillage and no-till systems4.
Zero tillage, also known as no-till farming, eliminates soil disturbance entirely except for the narrow slot created during planting. Seeds are placed directly into undisturbed soil using specialized equipment, maintaining 70 percent or more crop residue cover5. This approach fundamentally alters the soil ecosystem by preserving natural soil structure and biological activity.
Comparative analysis showing how different tillage practices reduce environmental impact and operational costs compared to conventional tillage methods
The Science Behind Reduced Soil Disturbance
The scientific foundation underlying conservation tillage rests on understanding soil as a living ecosystem rather than merely a growing medium. When soil undergoes intensive tillage, the mechanical action destroys soil aggregates, disrupts fungal hyphae networks, and exposes organic matter to accelerated decomposition6. This process releases stored carbon as carbon dioxide, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions while reducing soil organic matter content.
Research demonstrates that no-till systems preserve soil macropores created by earthworms and decomposing root channels, which serve critical functions in water infiltration and gas exchange6. Studies have shown that earthworm populations can increase by 160 percent under no-till management compared to conventionally tilled soils7. These biological improvements translate directly into enhanced soil health and crop performance over time.
The preservation of soil structure under conservation tillage also impacts water dynamics significantly. Minimum tillage systems show 20-50 percent improvements in water use efficiency compared to conventional tillage, resulting from enhanced infiltration and reduced evaporation7. In clay soils, peak infiltration rates can be 40-50 percent greater under conservation management7.
Comprehensive Benefits of No-Till and Reduced Tillage Systems
Environmental Advantages
The benefits of zero tillage extend across multiple environmental dimensions, creating cumulative positive impacts that strengthen agricultural sustainability. Soil erosion reduction represents perhaps the most visible benefit, with conservation tillage systems reducing erosion by 45-90 percent depending on the specific practice and environmental conditions58. This protection occurs through maintaining crop residue cover that shields soil from wind and water erosion while preserving soil structure that resists detachment.
Carbon sequestration emerges as a critical climate benefit of conservation tillage. Research indicates that no-till farming can increase soil organic carbon by 15 percent compared to conventional systems9. The reduced soil disturbance allows organic matter to accumulate naturally, with carbon sequestration rates ranging from 30-60 percent higher than conventional tillage2. This carbon storage contributes significantly to climate change mitigation while improving soil fertility.
Water conservation benefits manifest through multiple mechanisms in conservation tillage systems. The residue cover acts as natural mulch, reducing evaporation and moderating soil temperature. Water retention improvements of 20-50 percent have been documented across various conservation tillage systems10. This enhanced water efficiency proves particularly valuable in regions experiencing drought stress or irregular precipitation patterns.
Quantified benefits of no-till farming showing both percentage improvements and economic value per acre across key performance indicators
Economic Benefits and Cost Savings
The economic advantages of conservation tillage create compelling business cases for adoption across diverse agricultural operations. Fuel consumption reductions of 15-80 percent represent immediate and measurable savings, with many farmers reporting fuel use decreases of 50 percent or more when transitioning from conventional to no-till systems511. These savings become increasingly significant as fuel costs continue rising globally.
Labor cost reductions of 20-50 percent result from fewer field operations required in conservation tillage systems11. Where conventional tillage might require 5-6 field passes, no-till systems typically need only one pass for planting12. This efficiency translates into substantial time savings that allow farmers to manage larger operations or redirect labor to other value-adding activities.
Equipment costs also decrease over time with conservation tillage adoption. Reduced field passes mean less wear and tear on machinery, extending equipment life and reducing maintenance expenses. While initial investments in specialized no till farming tools may be substantial, economic modeling shows payback periods typically ranging from 1.8-4.1 years depending on the equipment type and farm size.
notill_equipment_costs.csv
Generated File
Productivity and Yield Considerations
Yield impacts under conservation tillage vary significantly based on soil type, climate, and management practices. Research shows yield increases typically ranging from 2-16 percent once systems are fully established58. However, many operations experience yield drag during the first 2-3 years of transition as soil biology adjusts to new management approaches13.
Long-term productivity benefits become more pronounced as soil health improves under conservation management. Studies document soil organic matter increases of 28-33 percent in no-till systems after extended adoption periods14. This enhanced soil fertility reduces fertilizer requirements while improving nutrient availability and crop resilience.
The quality of produce often improves under conservation tillage management. Research indicates that crops grown using these methods demonstrate better nutritional content and enhanced resistance to environmental stresses15. These quality improvements can command premium prices in markets increasingly focused on sustainability and nutritional value.
Essential No-Till Tools and Equipment
Core Equipment for Conservation Tillage
The successful implementation of conservation tillage requires specialized no till tools designed to operate effectively in high-residue environments. No-till drills represent the cornerstone of zero tillage operations, utilizing disc openers and coulters to cut through residue and create precise furrows for seed placement16. Modern no-till drills incorporate pneumatic seed delivery systems that ensure accurate seed placement while maintaining soil structure.
Precision planters equipped with residue management attachments enable effective planting in conservation tillage systems. These implements feature row cleaners, coulters, and closing wheels specifically designed to handle heavy residue while achieving optimal seed-to-soil contact17. Advanced planters integrate variable-rate seeding technology that adjusts planting density based on field conditions and yield potential mapping.
Strip-till units provide a hybrid approach that creates tilled zones for planting while preserving inter-row soil structure. These implements can apply fertilizer during tillage operations, providing nutrient placement advantages while minimizing soil disturbance18. Strip-till systems prove particularly effective in cooler climates where soil warming benefits crop establishment.
Specialized Tools for Residue and Weed Management
Roller crimpers offer organic and sustainable approaches to cover crop termination without chemical inputs. These implements mechanically terminate cover crops by rolling and crimping stems, creating natural mulch layers that suppress weeds while retaining soil moisture16. Roller crimpers enable farmers to manage cover crops without herbicides, supporting organic production systems.
Residue managers and row cleaners ensure effective planting conditions in high-residue environments. These attachments remove excessive residue from planting zones while maintaining adequate cover in non-planted areas17. Proper residue management proves critical for achieving uniform emergence and crop establishment in conservation tillage systems.
Minimum tillage tools include vertical tillage implements that provide shallow soil disturbance while maintaining surface residue. These tools use disc blades or tines to manage residue and improve soil conditions without full inversion19. Vertical tillage equipment operates at high speeds of 8-10 mph while maintaining shallow working depths of 2 inches or less.
Precision Agriculture Integration
Modern conservation tillage increasingly relies on precision agriculture technologies to optimize performance and efficiency. GPS auto-steer systems provide the accuracy necessary for consistent traffic patterns and precise implement guidance20. Research shows that 68.5 percent of no-till farmers currently use auto-steer technology, with adoption continuing to increase annually20.
Variable-rate application technology enables farmers to optimize input use based on field variability and soil conditions. These systems adjust seeding rates, fertilizer applications, and chemical treatments according to site-specific requirements, maximizing efficiency while minimizing environmental impact21. Integration of yield monitoring and field mapping creates data-driven management approaches that continuously improve system performance.
Drone technology and remote sensing provide real-time monitoring capabilities for conservation tillage operations. These tools enable early detection of pest problems, assess crop health, and guide management decisions throughout the growing season22. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms enhances the precision and effectiveness of these monitoring systems.
Global Adoption Patterns and Regional Variations
Worldwide No-Till Expansion
The global expansion of conservation tillage demonstrates its adaptability across diverse agricultural systems and climatic conditions. Worldwide no-till acres have increased by 93 percent over the past decade, reaching 507.6 million acres globally by 2018-191. This growth represents an annual adoption rate of approximately 25 million acres, indicating sustained momentum in conservation tillage adoption.
South America leads global adoption with some countries implementing no-till farming on 70 percent of total cultivated area23. Brazil and Argentina have emerged as pioneers in conservation tillage, with permanent no-till systems covering vast agricultural regions. These countries demonstrate that once adopted, soils are never tilled again, representing true commitment to conservation principles23.
Australia and New Zealand achieve the highest adoption rates globally at 85 percent of eligible cropland.
global_notill_adoption.csv
Generated File
The success in these regions reflects favorable policy environments, strong extension support, and agricultural systems well-suited to conservation tillage practices. North America maintains substantial acreage under no-till management, though adoption rates of 35 percent suggest significant expansion potential remains.
Regional variations in no-till farming adoption rates worldwide, showing both percentage adoption and total acreage
Regional Challenges and Opportunities
European adoption remains limited despite extensive research demonstrating conservation tillage benefits. Adoption rates of only 12 percent across Europe reflect regulatory barriers, traditional farming practices, and limited economic incentives for transition. However, annual growth rates of 4.2 percent indicate gradually increasing interest in conservation approaches.
Asian and African markets represent enormous expansion opportunities with current adoption rates of 8 percent and 3 percent respectively. These regions show annual growth rates of 6.8-15.2 percent, suggesting rapid development potential as awareness increases and appropriate technologies become available. Smallholder farmer adoption in these regions often requires modified approaches and equipment scaled to smaller operations24.
The variation in adoption patterns reflects site-specific factors including soil types, climate conditions, crop systems, and economic environments. Heavy clay soils often show greater benefits from conservation tillage due to improved drainage and reduced compaction25. Drier regions benefit significantly from enhanced water conservation, while erosion-prone areas realize immediate soil protection advantages.
Implementation Challenges and Solutions
Technical and Management Considerations
The transition to conservation tillage requires fundamental shifts in management approaches and technical skills. Weed management emerges as the primary challenge, as farmers can no longer rely on mechanical cultivation for weed control26. Successful conservation tillage operations develop integrated weed management strategies combining crop rotation, cover crops, and precision herbicide applications to maintain effective weed control.
Equipment compatibility represents a significant barrier for many farming operations considering conservation tillage adoption. Machinery matching requirements necessitate coordinated implement widths and operating speeds to maintain system efficiency27. Many farmers address this challenge through phased conversion approaches that spread equipment modifications across multiple years.
Learning curve requirements often extend 2-4 years as farmers develop expertise in conservation tillage management13. During this transition period, yield drag of 5-15 percent commonly occurs as soil biology adjusts to reduced disturbance13. Successful adopters emphasize patience and persistence while soil health improvements develop.
Economic Transition Strategies
Initial capital requirements for conservation tillage equipment can be substantial, ranging from $40,000-$100,000 depending on operation size and equipment needs26. Financing strategies include gradual equipment replacement, custom operator services, and equipment sharing arrangements that reduce individual farmer investment requirements.
Risk management during transition proves critical for successful adoption. Crop insurance programs increasingly recognize conservation tillage benefits and may offer premium discounts for adopted practices. Government incentive programs provide cost-share assistance for equipment purchases and annual payments for conservation practice adoption.
Market premiums for sustainably produced crops create additional economic incentives for conservation tillage adoption. Carbon credit programs offer potential revenue streams from enhanced carbon sequestration achieved through reduced tillage practices15. These market-based incentives complement production benefits to improve overall economic returns.
Addressing Site-Specific Challenges
Soil type considerations significantly influence conservation tillage success. Heavy clay soils may require drainage improvements before successful no-till implementation, while sandy soils benefit immediately from residue cover and reduced erosion25. Compaction issues may necessitate deep tillage prior to conservation tillage adoption to ensure adequate root penetration.
Climate adaptations optimize conservation tillage performance across diverse environmental conditions. Cool, wet climates may benefit from strip tillage approaches that provide soil warming while maintaining conservation benefits4. Arid regions realize maximum advantages from residue retention and water conservation aspects of no-till systems.
Crop rotation design becomes more critical in conservation tillage systems where mechanical pest control is limited. Diverse rotations incorporating cover crops break pest cycles while providing biological weed suppression28. Integrated pest management approaches replace tillage-based pest control with biological controls and precision applications of appropriate treatments.
Economic Analysis and Return on Investment
Cost-Benefit Analysis Framework
The economic evaluation of conservation tillage requires comprehensive analysis of both costs and benefits across multiple years. Initial equipment investments represent the largest upfront costs, but these are offset by immediate operational savings and long-term productivity improvements. Economic modeling demonstrates that total system profitability typically improves within 3-5 years of conservation tillage adoption11.
Annual operational savings provide immediate cash flow benefits that support equipment financing. Fuel cost reductions of $18 per acre combined with labor savings of $25 per acre create substantial annual savings on typical farming operations.
notill_benefits_quantification.csv
Generated File
These savings compound over time as equipment maintenance costs decrease due to reduced field operations.
Yield improvements contribute significantly to long-term economic returns. While initial yield drag may reduce short-term profitability, established conservation tillage systems often achieve yield premiums of 8 percent or more. Combined with quality improvements, these productivity gains generate economic value of $45 per acre annually.
Risk Assessment and Financial Planning
Weather resilience improvements under conservation tillage reduce production risks and stabilize farm income. Enhanced water retention provides drought protection, while improved soil structure reduces flooding damage and erosion losses10. These risk reductions improve crop insurance ratings and may qualify operations for premium discounts.
Market volatility impacts affect conservation tillage economics through input cost fluctuations and commodity price changes. Reduced input requirements provide some protection against fertilizer and fuel price increases, while enhanced soil fertility reduces dependence on external inputs over time. Diversified crop rotations common in conservation systems provide market risk distribution across multiple commodities.
Long-term asset appreciation occurs as soil health improvements increase land values and productivity potential. Soil organic matter increases and erosion control enhance long-term land productivity, creating capital appreciation that supplements annual operating returns. These improvements become particularly valuable during land sales or rental negotiations.
Future Trends and Technological Innovations
Emerging Technologies in Conservation Tillage
Autonomous machinery represents the next frontier in conservation tillage technology. Self-driving tractors and implements that precisely follow predetermined paths eliminate operator error and enable 24-hour operations during critical planting windows15. These systems integrate GPS guidance, obstacle detection, and automatic implement control to optimize field operations.
Artificial intelligence applications enhance decision-making in conservation tillage systems. Machine learning algorithms analyze soil conditions, weather patterns, and crop performance data to optimize planting timing, input applications, and management practices22. These technologies enable real-time adjustments that maximize system performance under variable conditions.
Sensor technologies provide continuous monitoring of soil and crop conditions in conservation tillage systems. Soil moisture sensors, compaction monitors, and nutrient analyzers generate real-time data that guides management decisions. Drone-mounted sensors and satellite imagery provide field-scale monitoring capabilities that detect problems before they impact yields.
Integration with Climate Smart Agriculture
Carbon farming initiatives increasingly recognize conservation tillage as a key climate mitigation strategy. Carbon credit markets offer financial incentives for enhanced carbon sequestration achieved through reduced tillage practices2. These programs provide additional revenue streams that improve overall economic returns from conservation tillage adoption.
Climate adaptation strategies position conservation tillage as essential for agricultural resilience under changing environmental conditions. Enhanced water retention and improved soil structure provide drought resilience, while erosion protection reduces extreme weather damage. These adaptations become increasingly valuable as climate variability intensifies globally.
Biodiversity enhancement through conservation tillage supports ecosystem services that complement agricultural production. Improved soil biological activity, enhanced pollinator habitat, and reduced chemical inputs create environmental benefits that may qualify for ecosystem service payments or conservation program incentives8.
Market Development and Policy Support
Consumer demand for sustainably produced food drives market premiums for crops grown using conservation tillage practices. Sustainability certification programs recognize conservation tillage as evidence of environmental stewardship, enabling premium pricing and preferred supplier status with environmentally conscious buyers15.
Policy initiatives increasingly support conservation tillage adoption through financial incentives and regulatory preferences. Agricultural subsidies targeting environmental benefits provide cost-share assistance for equipment purchases and annual payments for practice adoption. Water quality regulations may mandate or incentivize conservation tillage in sensitive watersheds.
International trade agreements increasingly incorporate sustainability standards that favor conservation tillage practices. Carbon border adjustments and environmental tariffs may create competitive advantages for products grown using sustainable practices, providing market incentives for conservation tillage adoption.
Conclusion: Transforming Agriculture Through Conservation Tillage
The comprehensive evidence demonstrates that no-till farming, minimum tillage, and zero tillage systems represent far more than simple modifications to conventional agriculture—they constitute fundamental transformations toward sustainable agricultural systems that benefit farmers, consumers, and the environment simultaneously. The benefits of no till farming extend across economic, environmental, and social dimensions, creating value propositions that strengthen with time as soil health improvements compound and environmental challenges intensify.
Global adoption trends indicate that conservation tillage has moved beyond experimental status to become mainstream agricultural practice in leading regions worldwide. The 93 percent increase in worldwide adoption over the past decade reflects growing recognition that these practices provide practical solutions to pressing agricultural challenges including soil erosion, water scarcity, labor shortages, and climate change impacts1.
The evolution of no till farming tools and minimum tillage tools continues to reduce implementation barriers while improving system performance. Precision agriculture integration enhances the effectiveness of conservation tillage by enabling site-specific management and real-time optimization of production systems. As autonomous technologies and artificial intelligence mature, conservation tillage systems will become increasingly sophisticated and efficient.
Economic analysis consistently demonstrates that conservation tillage provides positive returns on investment through reduced operating costs, improved yields, and enhanced resilience to environmental and market volatility. The multiple revenue streams from productivity improvements, cost savings, and ecosystem service payments create robust economic foundations for long-term sustainability.
The pros of no till farming position these practices as essential components of climate-smart agriculture that simultaneously addresses food security, environmental protection, and economic sustainability. As global agriculture faces increasing pressure to produce more food with fewer resources while reducing environmental impacts, conservation tillage systems provide proven pathways toward these seemingly conflicting objectives.
For farmers considering adoption of reduced till farming practices, the evidence supports measured implementation approaches that allow gradual transition while building expertise and system optimization. The learning curve associated with conservation tillage adoption is well-documented, but the long-term benefits justify the initial investment in time, equipment, and management changes required for successful implementation.
The future of agriculture increasingly depends on practices that enhance rather than degrade the natural resources upon which production depends. Soil and tillage relationships that preserve and improve soil health while maintaining productivity represent the foundation of sustainable agricultural intensification. Conservation tillage systems provide proven approaches to achieving these objectives while delivering immediate and long-term benefits to agricultural operations and the broader society they serve.
- https://notillagriculture.com/no-till-farming/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-no-till-farming/
- https://justagriculture.in/files/magazine/2021/october/010%20ZERO%20TILLAGE.pdf
- https://soilmanagement.ces.ncsu.edu/tillage-management/minimum-tillage/
- https://kellytillage.com/eu/conservation-tillage-how-to-practice-it/
- https://geopard.tech/blog/the-why-and-how-we-do-no-till-farming/
- https://kellytillage.com/us/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-zero-tillage/
- https://kellytillage.com/eu/what-are-the-benefits-of-minimum-tillage-system/
- https://sarep.ucdavis.edu/sustainable-ag/conservation-tillage
- https://cropcareequipment.com/blog/no-till-farming-pros-cons/
- https://eos.com/blog/no-till-farming/
- https://heritagetractor.com/blog/Best_Equipment_for_No-Till_Farming:_A_Sustainable_Approach
- https://www.kuhn-usa.com/agricultural-techniques/types-tillage/conservation-tillage/which-equipment-needed-minimum-tillage-methods
- https://allaboutfarmequipment.mystrikingly.com/blog/zero-tillage-farming-equipment-uses-and-benefits
- https://farmingadventures.com.au/2021/06/07/no-till-seeder/
- https://agrimachinery.africa/tillage/7-top-no-till-farming-equipment-for-efficient-soil-management/
- https://directseeding.com.au/zero-till/
- https://ongmac.com.au/product/new-equipment/agricultural-equipment/implements-attachments-and-machinery/great-plains/great-plains-mechanical-drills-planting/great-plains-606nt-no-till-seeder/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-till_farming
- https://www.farmprogress.com/farm-business/tillage-tools-for-minimum-tillage-operations
- https://cra.missouri.edu/topics/no-till-and-reduced-soil-disturbance/
- https://jcblagri.com/blog/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-zero-tillage-in-agriculture/
- https://www.farmstandapp.com/20282/no-till-farming-benefits-and-challenges/
- https://www.publish.csiro.au/SR/SR22119
- https://theoutcomesfund.com/in-the-news/economics-of-minimal-tillage
- https://www.victoriafarmeq.com/blog/disadvantages-of-no-till-farming
- https://www.kuhn.com.au/agricultural-techniques/minimum-tillage
- https://sonicnaturalfarming.com.au/regenerative-farming-australia/why-no-till-growing-is-revolutionising-small-mixed-crop-farming/
- https://archive.iwlearn.net/nutrients/whats-new/the-economic-agronomic-and-environmental-impact-of-no-till-on-the-canadian-prairies.pdf
- https://www.ars.usda.gov/oc/dof/ars-scientist-highlights-till-vs-no-till-farming/
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4147294/
- https://grdc.com.au/research/reports/report?id=3826
- https://agsci.oregonstate.edu/system/files/extcrs140striptillage.pdf
- https://www.westerngeneralinsurance.com.au/pros-and-cons-of-no-till-farming/
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095633925000188
- https://www.sare.org/resources/adding-cover-crops-to-a-no-till-system/
- https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/BenefitsOfStripTillageDuckert.pdf
- https://blancharddemofarms.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/No-Till-vs-Conventional-Tillage-Project.pdf
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006223000436
- https://ijabe.org/index.php/ijabe/article/view/223
- https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pa00jrf3.pdf
- https://www.bayer.com/sites/default/files/Reduced%20Tillage%20Paper_Final_5_30_19.pdf
- https://www.no-tillfarmer.com/articles/10906-worldwide-no-till-acres-increase-93-in-10-years
- https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0287441
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4913617/
- https://conservationagriculture.org/app/uploads/2019/02/DERPSH-et-al-CF-WORLDWIDE-ADOPTION-2010.pdf
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10745223/
- https://www.precisionfarmingdealer.com/articles/5050-no-tillers-use-of-precision-technology-continues-to-increase
- https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/minimum-tillage-systems-sustainable-agriculture
- https://thefarminginsider.com/conservation-tillage-advantages/
- https://www.futurefarming.com/smart-farming/tools-data/6-of-the-best-budget-gps-guidance-systems/
- https://www.no-tillfarmer.com/articles/13477-3-reasons-why-no-tillers-should-use-more-precision-technology
- https://thefarminginsider.com/conservation-tillage-solutions-for-weed-and-pest-management/
- https://www.kuhn.com.au/agricultural-techniques/minimum-tillage/minimum-tillage-organic-farming
- https://erem.ktu.lt/index.php/erem/article/view/20861/9933
- https://www.ars.usda.gov/arsuserfiles/20902500/davidhuggins/notill.pdf